linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: snd_dmaengine: add common api for pcm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:02:45 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	"perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>, "tiwai@...e.de" <tiwai@...e.de>,
	"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: snd_dmaengine: add common api for pcm_mmap

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 05:26:58PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> Other driver which can use this API are davinci, OMAP, samsung but
> because they are not using the snd_dmaengine_pcm driver's api as of
> now so not be very much useful for them.

There's no reason why we can't factor out more common code - this is
essentially what Lars-Peter was saying.

> Should I send one patch per driver change or squash all 4 file
> changes in one patch? Whatever will be easy or recommended?

It doesn't really matter that much, but please take on board
Lars-Peter's comments.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)