linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UBI: add minimal amount of reserved erase blocks in Kconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:22:29 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: add minimal amount of reserved erase blocks in
 Kconfig

On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 18:07 +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
> Agreed, it seems that 2% of the whole flash (at least for SLC device)
> is more realistic.

Agree, feel free to send a separate patch for this.

> > Frankly, I do not understand this logic :-) And your patch looks wrong -
> > it touches the "auto-format" code which you may consider more like a
> > "debugging" feature and should not rely on this in production.
> Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by the "auto-format" code.

Yeah, right, this comment was incorrect, sorry.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)