[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FEC860B.3090605@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:27:55 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4][RFC] kvm: eoi_eventfd
On 06/24/2012 06:02 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 15:56 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 06/23/2012 01:16 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> > I think we're probably also going to need something like this.
>> > When running in non-accelerated qemu, we're going to have to
>> > create some kind of EOI notifier for drivers. VFIO can make
>> > additional improvements when running on KVM so it will probably
>> > make use of the KVM_IRQFD_LEVEL_EOI interface, but we don't
>> > want to have a generic EOI notifier in qemu that just stops
>> > working when kvm-ioapic is enabled.
>>
>> Why?
>
> Hmm, I must be missing something or not describing it correctly, because
> it seems obvious.
I have not exhausted this quarter's quota of stupid questions yet.
> If we create a dependency in qemu of needing to know
> when an eoi occurs and notifier a driver and have no way to fulfill that
> dependency when running on kvm... that'd be bad, right? I don't want to
> assume that every consumer of such an interface would prefer to make use
> of an irqfd. Not sure if that answers your question though. Thanks,
I meant, what scenario do you have in mind where we want the EOI
notifier while running with kvm-irqchip enabled? Perhaps I phrased my
question a bit too tersely.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists