linux-kernel - Re: Attaching a process to cgroups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1340851258.7382.29.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 04:40:58 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Alexey Vlasov <renton@...ton.name>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Attaching a process to cgroups

On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 10:10 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> I really did mean "remove".  Removing a synchronize_rcu() does result
> in a race, but often an extremely low-probability race.  So you can
> remove a synchronize_rcu() and get lucky for a long time, but sooner
> or later, something will explode.

Ah.  Android patches did "replace", and it still didn't take long at all
for bad luck to happen.. so "remove" for that particular instance would
probably result in "sooner" variety explosions :)

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/