[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120628183145.GE22641@google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:31:45 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: memcg: cat: memory.memsw.* : Operation not supported
Hello, KAME.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:04:16PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> >I still wish it's folded into CONFIG_MEMCG and conditionalized just on
> >CONFIG_SWAP tho.
> >
>
> In old days, memsw controller was not very stable. So, we devided the config.
> And, it makes size of memory for swap-device double (adds 2bytes per swapent.)
> That is the problem.
I see. Do you think it's now reasonable to drop the separate config
option? Having memcg enabled but swap unaccounted sounds half-broken
to me.
> IIRC...at that time, we made decision, cgroup has no feature to
> 'create files dynamically'. Then, we made it in static, decision was done
> at compile time and ignores "do_swap_account".
>
> Now, IIUC, we have the feature. So, it's may be a time to create the file
> with regard to "do_swap_account", making decision at boot time.
Heh, yeah, maybe I'm confused about how it happened. Anyways, let's
get it fixed.
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists