lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120628022414.30496.98256.stgit@kitami.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:24:14 -0700
From:	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/16] sched: track the runnable average on a per-task entitiy
	basis

Instead of tracking averaging the load parented by a cfs_rq, we can track
entity load directly.  With the load for a given cfs_Rq then being the sum of
its children.

To do this we represent the historical contribution to runnable average within each
trailing 1024us of execution as the coefficients of a geometric series.

We can express this for a given task t as:
  runnable_sum(t) = \Sum u_i * y^i ,
  load(t) = weight_t * runnable_sum(t) / (\Sum 1024 * y^i)

Where: u_i is the usage in the last i`th 1024us period (approximately 1ms) ~ms
and y is chosen such that y^k = 1/2.  We currently choose k to be 32 which
roughly translates to about a sched period.

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    8 +++
 kernel/sched/debug.c  |    4 ++
 kernel/sched/fair.c   |  128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 9dced2e..5bf5c79 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1136,6 +1136,11 @@ struct load_weight {
 	unsigned long weight, inv_weight;
 };
 
+struct sched_avg {
+	u32 runnable_avg_sum, runnable_avg_period;
+	u64 last_runnable_update;
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
 struct sched_statistics {
 	u64			wait_start;
@@ -1196,6 +1201,9 @@ struct sched_entity {
 	/* rq "owned" by this entity/group: */
 	struct cfs_rq		*my_q;
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	struct sched_avg	avg;
+#endif
 };
 
 struct sched_rt_entity {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index c09a4e7..cd5ef23 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct task_group
 	P(se->statistics.wait_count);
 #endif
 	P(se->load.weight);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	P(se->avg.runnable_avg_sum);
+	P(se->avg.runnable_avg_period);
+#endif
 #undef PN
 #undef P
 }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 3704ad3..864a122 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -976,6 +976,125 @@ static inline void update_entity_shares_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+/*
+ * Approximate:
+ *   val * y^n,    where y^32 ~= 0.5 (~1 scheduling period)
+ */
+static __always_inline u64 decay_load(u64 val, int n)
+{
+	for (; n && val; n--) {
+		val *= 4008;
+		val >>= 12;
+	}
+
+	return val;
+}
+
+/* We can represent the historical contribution to runnable average as the
+ * coefficients of a geometric series.  To do this we sub-divide our runnable
+ * history into segments of approximately 1ms (1024us); label the segment that
+ * occurred N-ms ago p_N, with p_0 corresponding to the current period, e.g.
+ *
+ * [<- 1024us ->|<- 1024us ->|<- 1024us ->| ...
+ *      p0            p1           p1
+ *     (now)       (~1ms ago)  (~2ms ago)
+ *
+ * Let u_i denote the fraction of p_i that the entity was runnable.
+ *
+ * We then designate the fractions u_i as our co-efficients, yielding the
+ * following representation of historical load:
+ *   u_0 + u_1*y + u_2*y^2 + u_3*y^3 + ...
+ *
+ * We choose y based on the with of a reasonably scheduling period, fixing:
+ *   y^32 = 0.5
+ *
+ * This means that the contribution to load ~32ms ago (u_32) will be weighted
+ * approximately half as much as the contribution to load within the last ms
+ * (u_0).
+ *
+ * When a period "rolls over" and we have new u_0`, multiplying the previous
+ * sum again by y is sufficient to update:
+ *   load_avg = u_0` + y*(u_0 + u_1*y + u_2*y^2 + ... )
+ *            = u_0 + u_1*y + u_2*y^2 + ... [re-labeling u_i --> u_{i+1]
+ */
+static __always_inline int __update_entity_runnable_avg(u64 now,
+							struct sched_avg *sa,
+							int runnable)
+{
+	u64 delta;
+	int delta_w, decayed = 0;
+
+	delta = now - sa->last_runnable_update;
+	/*
+	 * This should only happen when time goes backwards, which it
+	 * unfortunately does during sched clock init when we swap over to TSC.
+	 */
+	if ((s64)delta < 0) {
+		sa->last_runnable_update = now;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Use 1024ns as the unit of measurement since it's a reasonable
+	 * approximation of 1us and fast to compute.
+	 */
+	delta >>= 10;
+	if (!delta)
+		return 0;
+	sa->last_runnable_update = now;
+
+	/* delta_w is the amount already accumulated against our next period */
+	delta_w = sa->runnable_avg_period % 1024;
+	if (delta + delta_w >= 1024) {
+		/* period roll-over */
+		decayed = 1;
+
+		/*
+		 * Now that we know we're crossing a period boundary, figure
+		 * out how much from delta we need to complete the current
+		 * period and accrue it.
+		 */
+		delta_w = 1024 - delta_w;
+		BUG_ON(delta_w > delta);
+		do {
+			if (runnable)
+				sa->runnable_avg_sum += delta_w;
+			sa->runnable_avg_period += delta_w;
+
+			/*
+			 * Remainder of delta initiates a new period, roll over
+			 * the previous.
+			 */
+			sa->runnable_avg_sum =
+				decay_load(sa->runnable_avg_sum, 1);
+			sa->runnable_avg_period =
+				decay_load(sa->runnable_avg_period, 1);
+
+			delta -= delta_w;
+			/* New period is empty */
+			delta_w = 1024;
+		} while (delta >= 1024);
+	}
+
+	/* Remainder of delta accrued against u_0` */
+	if (runnable)
+		sa->runnable_avg_sum += delta;
+	sa->runnable_avg_period += delta;
+
+	return decayed;
+}
+
+/* Update a sched_entity's runnable average */
+static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+	__update_entity_runnable_avg(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se))->clock_task, &se->avg,
+				     se->on_rq);
+}
+#else
+static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se) {}
+#endif
+
 static void enqueue_sleeper(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
@@ -1102,6 +1221,7 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 	 */
 	update_curr(cfs_rq);
 	update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
+	update_entity_load_avg(se);
 	account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
 	update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
 
@@ -1176,6 +1296,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 	 * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
 	 */
 	update_curr(cfs_rq);
+	update_entity_load_avg(se);
 
 	update_stats_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
 	if (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP) {
@@ -1345,6 +1466,8 @@ static void put_prev_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *prev)
 		update_stats_wait_start(cfs_rq, prev);
 		/* Put 'current' back into the tree. */
 		__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, prev);
+		/* in !on_rq case, update occurred at dequeue */
+		update_entity_load_avg(prev);
 	}
 	cfs_rq->curr = NULL;
 }
@@ -1358,6 +1481,11 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr, int queued)
 	update_curr(cfs_rq);
 
 	/*
+	 * Ensure that runnable average is periodically updated.
+	 */
+	update_entity_load_avg(curr);
+
+	/*
 	 * Update share accounting for long-running entities.
 	 */
 	update_entity_shares_tick(cfs_rq);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ