[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120628152540.cc13a735.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:25:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, <devel@...nvz.org>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Kir Kolyshkin <kir@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: Fork bomb limitation in memcg WAS: Re: [PATCH 00/11] kmem
controller for memcg: stripped down version
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:01:23 +0400
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
OK, that all sounds convincing ;) Please summarise and capture this
discussion in the [patch 0/n] changelog so we (or others) don't have to
go through this all again. And let's remember this in the next
patchset!
> Last, but not least, note that it is totally within my interests to
> merge the slab tracking as fast as we can. it'll be a matter of going
> back to it, and agreeing in the final form.
Yes, I'd very much like to have the whole slab implementation in a
reasonably mature state before proceeding too far with this base
patchset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists