[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340930720.2563.5.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:45:20 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
PowerPC email list <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH powerpc 2/2] kfree the cache name of pgtable cache if
SLUB is used
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 17:54 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> index 620b7ac..c9d2a7f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ void pgtable_cache_add(unsigned shift, void
> (*ctor)(void *))
> align = max_t(unsigned long, align, minalign);
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pgtable-2^%d", shift);
> new = kmem_cache_create(name, table_size, align, 0, ctor);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB
> + kfree(name); /* SLUB duplicates the cache name */
> +#endif
> PGT_CACHE(shift) = new;
>
> pr_debug("Allocated pgtable cache for order %d\n", shift);
This is very gross ... and fragile. Also the subtle difference in
semantics between SLUB and SLAB is a VERY BAD IDEA.
I reckon you should make the other allocators all copy the name
instead.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists