[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120629125845.GA32730@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:58:45 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartmann <greg@...ah.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>
Subject: Re: cosmetic printk() issue with lockdep warning in
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 12:49 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > All we want is a reliable printk
>
> We too, but we define reliable differently. I want printk() to
> dump data ASAP so that it has better chance to get out of the
> system and onto my console in case of a crash. I don't give a
> rats arse about interleaved text, any text is better than no
> text.
I actually *fixed* bugs in the past when I saw interleaved text
printed from multiple CPUs, it told me how narrow and SMP
dependent a particular race/crash was.
So even interleaving, although annoying most of the time, can be
useful in some other places.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists