[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120629183233.GC21048@google.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:32:33 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for -3.5] memblock: free allocated
memblock_reserved_regions later
Hello, Yinghai.
Just one nitpick.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> /**
> * memblock_double_array - double the size of the memblock regions array
> * @type: memblock type of the regions array being doubled
> @@ -204,6 +192,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_doub
> phys_addr_t new_area_size)
> {
> struct memblock_region *new_array, *old_array;
> + phys_addr_t old_alloc_size, new_alloc_size;
> phys_addr_t old_size, new_size, addr;
> int use_slab = slab_is_available();
> int *in_slab;
> @@ -217,6 +206,12 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_doub
> /* Calculate new doubled size */
> old_size = type->max * sizeof(struct memblock_region);
> new_size = old_size << 1;
> + /*
> + * We need to allocated new one align to PAGE_SIZE,
> + * so late could free them completely.
An extra space and probably "so we can free them completely later"
fits better.
Thank you!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists