linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120629133046.f6c65d4d6017d2ae486cfd2b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:30:46 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

Hi Dave,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c between commit 7aa1e7f06d6e ("Revert
"drm/i915: allow PCH PWM override on IVB"") from Linus' tree and commit
7cf416014813 ("drm/i915: clear up backlight #define confusion on gen4+")
from the drm tree.

The former removed the function ivb_pch_pwm_override() that is modified
by the latter, so I did that - or should I have just ignored the revert
patch?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped