linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fat: Refactor shortname parsing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1340997235.9826.7.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:13:55 -0500
From:	"Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Refactor shortname parsing

On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 04:08 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: 
> "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com> writes:
> 
> > Nearly identical shortname parsing is performed in fat_search_long()
> > and __fat_readdir(). Extract this code into a function that may be
> > called by both.
> 
> What is the difference, and why changes was needed?

The only difference I could see was in the "dot_hidden" functionality.  
fat_search_long() never does it; __fat_readdir() does it only when the
'dotsOK' option is active.

The changes are not 'needed'; they are purely to simplify future
maintenance of the code.

Regards,
Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/