[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FED4BB7.6070706@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:01:19 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
CC: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: Add support for rate table based dividers
Hi Mike,
> After thinking about it a bit more I still think a separate
> clk_register_divider_table is needed. Primarily this would reduce
> needless churn in having to update all existing users of
> clk_register_divider. I also think that clearly separating the two
> functions will make it a bit easier on folks trying to port their clocks
> trees over.
>
> Unless there is a technical reason why having two registration functions
> is a bad idea, can you send a V4 with that new registration function?
> I'll take it into clk-next.
>
Nope, no technical reason why it can't be done. I'll do what you
suggested and post a v4 soon.
thanks,
Rajendra
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists