linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 09/23] x86_64: Store userspace rsp in system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120629080327.GE940@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:03:27 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	acme@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu,
	paulus@...ba.org, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, eranian@...gle.com,
	gorcunov@...nvz.org, tzanussi@...il.com, mhiramat@...hat.com,
	robert.richter@....com, fche@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	drepper@...il.com, asharma@...com, benjamin.redelings@...cent.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/23] x86_64: Store userspace rsp in system_call fastpath

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:08:49PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:48:00PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> > I'd need help with this change.. basically it works, but I guess
> > I could alter the FIXUP_TOP_OF_STACK macro as well, so the rsp is
> > not initialized twice in slowpath.
> > 
> > But it seems quite complex.. so not really sure at the moment ;)
> > 
> > ideas?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> > 
> > ---
> > Storing the userspace rsp into the pt_regs struct for the
> > system_call fastpath (syscall instruction handler).
> > 
> > Following part of the pt_regs is allocated on stack:
> > (via KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET)
> > 
> >     unsigned long ip;
> >     unsigned long cs;
> >     unsigned long flags;
> >     unsigned long sp;
> >     unsigned long ss;
> > 
> > but only ip is actually saved for fastpath.
> > 
> > For perf post unwind we need at least ip and sp to be able to
> > start the unwind, so storing the old_rsp value to the sp.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> > Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S |    5 +++++
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> > index 111f6bb..0444917 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> > @@ -516,6 +516,11 @@ GLOBAL(system_call_after_swapgs)
> >  	SAVE_ARGS 8,0
> >  	movq  %rax,ORIG_RAX-ARGOFFSET(%rsp)
> >  	movq  %rcx,RIP-ARGOFFSET(%rsp)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> > +	/* We need rsp in fast path for perf post unwind. */
> > +	movq  PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp), %rcx
> > +	movq  %rcx,RSP-ARGOFFSET(%rsp)
> > +#endif
> 
> Another solution is to set/unset some TIF flag in perf_event_sched_in/out
> such that we take the syscall slow path (tracesys) which records every non-scratch
> registers. I can see that old_rsp is not saved in pt_regs by SAVE_REST so this may be
> something to add in tracesys.
> 
> This way we don't bloat the syscall fastpath with a feature only used by some
> developers.

ok, this could work for task related events

but will need to think about how to do this for cpu related events which
hit the same issue and we dont have a task to flag.. maybe do it the same
way as for TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT and flag everyone ;)

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/