linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch] BFS: 421-1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+i8gKKnz1i-ojwUP5AetBLsGVLyRXP3FNUXA1UkMm430ZYXFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jul 2012 23:13:35 +0700
From:	Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
To:	Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] BFS: 421-1

On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org> wrote:
> On 01.07.2012, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>> With 15 patches collected, the 421-1 is ready with iso untouched.
>> Note diff is based not on 420 but on 421.
> [....]
>
> There is no v.421 on ck.kolivas.org, and it seems it never has
> been, at least there is a patch which updates v.420 directly to v.422
> which indicates that there isn't any v.421. So what version is your
> patchset actually based on?

Con skipped 421 because Hillf did release a 421 BFS, he wanted to
avoid confusion. There are two patches in this thread, the first one
is based on Hillf's 421 (you can find the patch on lkml) and a second
one based on Con's 420 BFS. Hope it's a bit more clear now.

@Hillf, 421-1 builds and boots fine. Too early for me to give any
feedback on improvements and/or regressions this patch brings.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/