| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87d34fs914.fsf@xmission.com> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 10:09:27 -0700 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: hacklu <embedway.linux@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, boot: Optimize the elf header handling. "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes: > On 07/01/2012 09:26 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Fair enough. It looks like somehow SMP got unset in my test >> configuration and enabling SMP certainly kills the boot for >> me. So it looks like I can reproduce this. >> >> So I am guess I just missed something. Ugh. >> >> Digging deeper... >> > > Could there be a VMA/LMA confusion? The VMA for the .data..percpu > section is zero. I am suspecting something similar. At the moment I am trying to remember how to get early printk working in misc.c so I can poke around a bit more. The theory that I was working on, that used to be true, and seems to be true of everything except the percpu section is that objcopy just does the right thing when creating vmlinux.bin. vmlinux.bin being what we compress. I don't see anything obviously wrong with the headers of vmlinux.bin although we still unnecessarily have section headers in that file. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists