linux-kernel - Re: [ 15/48] e1000e: Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM L1 disablement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120701225950.GD3728@burratino>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jul 2012 17:59:50 -0500
From:	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net>,
	Jeff Pieper <jeffrey.e.pieper@...el.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [ 15/48] e1000e: Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM  L1
 disablement

Ben Hutchings wrote:

> 3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net>
>
> commit 59aed95263bdd0e2b48eb9be5a94346d2d4abf90 upstream.

This patch still seems both lovely and unnecessary, and I would prefer
that it not be part of 3.2-stable.  If I understood the replies before,
it is safe to drop it, right?

Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/