[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120701105934.GD16319@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 11:59:35 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
giancarlo.asnaghi@...com, alan@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] x86: add CONFIG_ARM_AMBA, selected by STA2X11
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> How should I address the problem? (original code, published on
> sourceforge was simply replicating a number of amba drivers into pci
> drivers, but I don't think massive code duplication is ever sensible,
> thus I preferred to reuse the existing drivers).
I think the answer is... those primecell drivers need fixing in some way.
Re-defining CS, DS and ES in drivers is rather silly given that they're
x86 segment register names - so if PL330 can be fixed to make its names
more specific, that sorts it out.
As for PL08x, which depends on asm/hardware/pl080.h, I think that's going
to have to be a config dependency - it would be nice to move that header
into drivers/dma and make it private to the amba-pl08x driver, but we have
definitions in there which platforms supply to the pl08x driver via
platform data. I'd rather not stuff the register definitions into
include/linux/platform_data/...
Note also that hpa has only reported the first errors he encountered, so
there may be more, and that's somehting which needs checking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists