| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4FF14BF4.5070007@bootc.net> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:21:24 +0100 From: Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net> To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jeff Pieper <jeffrey.e.pieper@...el.com>, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> Subject: Re: [ 15/48] e1000e: Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM L1 disablement On 01/07/2012 23:59, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> >> ------------------ >> >> From: Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net> >> >> commit 59aed95263bdd0e2b48eb9be5a94346d2d4abf90 upstream. > This patch still seems both lovely and unnecessary, and I would prefer > that it not be part of 3.2-stable. If I understood the replies before, > it is safe to drop it, right? My only comment about this would be that I haven't tested it without both patches, although I can't see why there would necessarily be a problem with only having one patch and not the other. HTH, Chris -- Chris Boot bootc@...tc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists