[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341226856.29646.8.camel@gurkel.linbit>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:00:56 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...bit.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [TCP 1/3] tcp: Add MSG_NEW_PACKET flag to indicate
preferable packet boundaries
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 19:15 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 17:38 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>
> > The primary use case is fast Gigabit (10 or more) Ethernet connections
> > with jumbo frames and switches that support them. There, frames will go
> > through unchanged and you can zero-copy receive all the time.
> >
> > Not sure how well the approach scales to other kinds of connections; it
> > may work often enough to be worth it. When things get distorted between
> > the sender and the receiver and tcp_recvbio() fails, the data can still
> > be copied out of the socket as before.
>
> If you have a packet loss, receiver can and will coalesce frames.
That's alright as long as we'll get "back to normal" eventually; the
only effect will be that we'll copy data out of the socket receive
buffers for a while. There will be extremely little packet loss on the
kinds of networks that we want to use this on.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists