[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871ukunqp3.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:11:20 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Refactor shortname parsing
"Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 23:36 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com> writes:
>>
>> > True, but with the change you suggest we lose the incrementing of 'i',
>> > which likely would cause an infinite loop for 1:1 Unicode conversions.
>>
>> You meant, we just have to do
>>
>> if (!is_vfat)
>> ptname[i] = ...;
>> i++;
>>
>> or something? I still feel this looks better to indicate, we don't use
>> ptname in the case of vfat.
>
> I can change it, but there are other places in that function where
> ptname is used that are not qualified with !is_vfat, so I don't know
> whether this improves clarity or reduces it.
>
> I do think fat_tolower() should not be making decisions. IMHO the
> trigraph and a comment, perhaps before the vfat-only reassignment of
> 'name', would be clearer.
Hm, the primary case is vfat. fat_tolower()/hidden is required only for
msdos, and ptname too. So, my suggestion is trying to keep vfat case
clean.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists