linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] List LGPL (v2 / v2.1) as GPL compatible in license_is_gpl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120701171828.GL6079@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:18:28 +0200
From:	Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] List LGPL (v2 / v2.1) as GPL compatible in
 license_is_gpl_compatible()

Hi all,

I'd like to follow-up to this message, as the patch didn't get merged
during the last month.

It still feels odd to see messages about "LGPL" tainting the kernel.  Is
this really the intended behaviour?

Regards,
	Harald

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/