[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF211BD.8060203@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:25:17 +0200
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video/smscufx: fix line counting in fb_write
Hi Florian,
sorry for the late answer.
Am 13.05.2012 14:47, schrieb Florian Tobias Schandinat:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On 04/21/2012 11:26 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> as for the patch for udlfb, I forgot to mention that this is a candidate
>> for all stable trees 3.2 and above.
>>
>> Btw., the address of the maintainer doesn't seem to be valid anymore.
>
> it is better to cc me on patches to the framebuffer subsystem for such
> cases. I don't have much free time so it's rare that I come around to
> dig in the mailing list.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Alexander
>>
>> Am 21.04.2012 00:11, schrieb Alexander Holler:
>>> Line 0 and 1 were both written to line 0 (on the display) and all
>>> subsequent
>>> lines had an offset of -1. The result was that the last line on the
>>> display
>>> was never overwritten by writes to /dev/fbN.
>>>
>>> The origin of this bug seems to have been udlfb.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler<holler@...oftware.de>
>>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> Patch looks good to me but can be made simpler.
>
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/video/smscufx.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/smscufx.c b/drivers/video/smscufx.c
>>> index ccbfef5..1e1e2d2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/video/smscufx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/video/smscufx.c
>>> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static ssize_t ufx_ops_write(struct fb_info *info,
>>> const char __user *buf,
>>> result = fb_sys_write(info, buf, count, ppos);
>>>
>>> if (result> 0) {
>>> - int start = max((int)(offset / info->fix.line_length) - 1, 0);
>>> + int start = max((int)(offset / info->fix.line_length), 0);
>
> the cast to int as well as the max is superfluous without the -1 as the
> value can no longer be negative.
I had that impression too, but I wanted to change as less as possible,
so I didn't had the need to check types and (their) sizes for possible
overflows or such. I was lazy and just wanted to fix that one bug. ;)
>
>>> int lines = min((u32)((result / info->fix.line_length) + 1),
>>> (u32)info->var.yres);
>>>
Regards,
Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists