| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4FF21D48.50301@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:14:32 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Lists Linaro-dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>, Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Rob Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please On 07/02/2012 09:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, July 02, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> >> On 07/02/2012 11:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Lezcano >>> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote: >>> >>>> we discussed last week to put in place a tree grouping the cpuidle >>>> modifications [1]. Is it possible to add the tree ? >>>> >>>> git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git #cpuidle-next >>> >>> Thanks for doing this. >>> >>> Since MAINTAINERS is lacking a listed maintainer for cpuidle, >>> are you also going to add yourself as maintainer and list this >>> tree in that file, or is this a one-time exercise? >> >> I will be glad to do that if Len and Rafael agree on that. > > Len Brown has been a cpuidle maintainer for some time now. Moreover, > he's been taking patches, but Linus refused to pull his entire tree during the > last merge window (as you probably know). I honestly don't think this is > a good enough reason for replacing him as a cpuidle maintainer by force. > > So, you should ask Len whether or not he's willing to pass the cpuidle > maintenance to someone else. No, no. You are misunderstanding what I am proposing. I don't want to replace Len I just want to act as a "proxy". I understand a maintainer can be busy and could not have enough time to take care of the subsystem is maintaining during a period because he's too busy for that. Trust me, I fully understand that :) As there are a lot of modifications of cpuidle, I am proposing to take the patches when they are acked-by, to create a consolidated tree, providing a better integration for cpuidle, a wider testing, preventing conflicts and facilitating Len's work if he agrees to pull from this tree. If that makes sense to add myself to the MAINTAINER file as a co-maintainer (understand: send to me also the patches, so I can take care of them if Len does not respond), I am ok with that. It is just about helping :) > I know that Len hasn't been responsive recently, but I also know that he > _does_ respond to inquiries sent directly to him. Do you mean to its intel address ? Thanks -- Daniel > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists