[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF12A69.3010705@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:58:17 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Don Morris <don.morris@...com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/40] autonuma: add CONFIG_AUTONUMA and CONFIG_AUTONUMA_DEFAULT_ENABLED
On 06/28/2012 08:56 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Add the config options to allow building the kernel with AutoNUMA.
>
> If CONFIG_AUTONUMA_DEFAULT_ENABLED is "=y", then
> /sys/kernel/mm/autonuma/enabled will be equal to 1, and AutoNUMA will
> be enabled automatically at boot.
>
> CONFIG_AUTONUMA currently depends on X86, because no other arch
> implements the pte/pmd_numa yet and selecting =y would result in a
> failed build, but this shall be relaxed in the future. Porting
> AutoNUMA to other archs should be pretty simple.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli<aarcange@...hat.com>
The Makefile changes could be merged into this patch
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 82fed4e..330dd51 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -207,6 +207,19 @@ config MIGRATION
> pages as migration can relocate pages to satisfy a huge page
> allocation instead of reclaiming.
>
> +config AUTONUMA
> + bool "Auto NUMA"
> + select MIGRATION
> + depends on NUMA&& X86
How about having the x86 architecture export a
HAVE_AUTONUMA flag, and testing for that?
> + help
> + Automatic NUMA CPU scheduling and memory migration.
This could be expanded to list advantages and
disadvantages of having autonuma enabled.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists