[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <331ABD5ECB02734CA317220B2BBEABC13E9E8E0E@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 07:16:03 +0000
From: "AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@...com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
CC: "Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps65217: Fix voltage boundary checking
in tps65217_pmic_map_voltage
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:39:45, Axel Lin wrote:
>
> > In side tps65217_pmic_map_voltage() we have
> >
> > tps->info[rid]->uv_to_vsel(850000, &sel) nothing but
> > tps65217_uv_to_vsel1(850000, &sel);
> >
> > sel = (((850000 - 900000) + (25000) - 1) / (25000));
> > sel = ((-25001)/(25000));
> > sel = -1; /* Which is not expected */
> >
> > Ideally this would be the change
> >
> > if (min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV)
> > min_uV = tps->info[rid]->min_uV;
> >
> ok. I got your point now.
>
> So if min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV, we need to set
> min_uV = tps->info[rid]->min_uV.
> This is because the equation we used in uv_to_vsel() does not allow
> min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV, otherwise it returns negative selector.
>
>
> > if (max_uV > tps->info[rid]->max_uV)
> > max_uV = tps->info[rid]->max_uV;
>
> This looks not necessary. the equation in uv_to_vsel() does not use
> max_uV.
>
Yes, I agree.
Regards
AnilKumar--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists