[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341313938-17861-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:42:18 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
To: <mturquette@...com>, <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: fix parent validation in __clk_set_parent()
The below commit introduced a bug in __clk_set_parent()
which could cause it to *skip* the parent validation
which makes sure the parent passed to the api is a valid
one.
commit 7975059db572eb47f0fb272a62afeae272a4b209
Author: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Date: Wed Jun 6 14:41:31 2012 +0530
clk: Allow late cache allocation for clk->parents
This was identified by the following compiler warning..
drivers/clk/clk.c: In function '__clk_set_parent':
drivers/clk/clk.c:1083:5: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
.. as reported by Marc Kleine-Budde.
There were various options discussed on how to fix this, one
being initing 'i' to clk->num_parents, but the below approach
was found to be more appropriate as it also makes the 'parent
validation' code simpler to read.
Reported-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 8996f46..46317cb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1067,26 +1067,24 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
old_parent = clk->parent;
- /* find index of new parent clock using cached parent ptrs */
- if (clk->parents)
- for (i = 0; i < clk->num_parents; i++)
- if (clk->parents[i] == parent)
- break;
- else
+ if (!clk->parents)
clk->parents = kzalloc((sizeof(struct clk*) * clk->num_parents),
GFP_KERNEL);
/*
- * find index of new parent clock using string name comparison
- * also try to cache the parent to avoid future calls to __clk_lookup
+ * find index of new parent clock using cached parent ptrs,
+ * or if not yet cached, use string name comparison and cache
+ * them now to avoid future calls to __clk_lookup.
*/
- if (i == clk->num_parents)
- for (i = 0; i < clk->num_parents; i++)
- if (!strcmp(clk->parent_names[i], parent->name)) {
- if (clk->parents)
- clk->parents[i] = __clk_lookup(parent->name);
- break;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < clk->num_parents; i++) {
+ if (clk->parents && clk->parents[i] == parent)
+ break;
+ else if (!strcmp(clk->parent_names[i], parent->name)) {
+ if (clk->parents)
+ clk->parents[i] = __clk_lookup(parent->name);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
if (i == clk->num_parents) {
pr_debug("%s: clock %s is not a possible parent of clock %s\n",
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists