lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1341323008-29414-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue,  3 Jul 2012 16:43:25 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] fs/sysv: stop using write_supers and s_dirt

This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()'
call-back and the '->s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
once all users are gone.

Compile-tested only. If someone can give me a sysv image I could loop-mount
and test my changes - I'd appreciate. I could not find any tool to create this
ancient file-system. But I think my changes should not break it.

Reminder:

The goal is to get rid of the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread. This kernel thread
wakes up every 5 seconds (by default) and calls '->write_super()' for all
mounted file-systems. And the bad thing is that this is done even if all the
superblocks are clean. Moreover, many file-systems do not even need this end
they do not register the '->write_super()' method at all (e.g., btrfs).

So 'sync_supers()' most often just generates useless wake-ups and wastes power.
I am trying to make all file-systems independent of '->write_super()' and plan
to remove 'sync_supers()' and '->write_super()' completely once there are no
more users.

======
Overall status:

1.  ext4: patches submitted,
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/3/210
2.  exofs: patch submitted,
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/4/211
3.  udf: patch submitted, sits in Jan Kara's tree:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/4/233
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs for_testing
4.  affs: patches submitted, sit in Al Viro's tree:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/6/400
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs for-next
5.  hfs: patches submitted, sit Andrew Morton's tree
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/12/82
6.  hfsplus: patches submitted, sit in Andre Morton's tree:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/13/195
7.  ext2:     done, see commit f72cf5e223a28d3b3ea7dc9e40464fd534e359e8
8.  vfat:     done, see commit 78491189ddb6d84d4a4abae992ed891a236d0263
9.  jffs2:    done, see commit 208b14e507c00ff7f108e1a388dd3d8cc805a443
10. reiserfs: done, see commit 033369d1af1264abc23bea2e174aa47cdd212f6f

TODO: ufs
======

 fs/sysv/inode.c |   18 +-----------------
 fs/sysv/sysv.h  |    1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Thanks,
Artem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ