lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF3001C.9020706@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:22:20 +0300
From:	Ronen Hod <rhod@...hat.com>
To:	dlaor@...hat.com
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk

On 06/18/2012 02:14 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 01:05 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:03:23 +0800, Asias He<asias@...hat.com>  wrote:
>>> On 06/18/2012 03:46 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:53:10 +0800, Asias He<asias@...hat.com>  wrote:
>>>>> This patch introduces bio-based IO path for virtio-blk.
>>>>
>>>> Why make it optional?
>>>
>>> request-based IO path is useful for users who do not want to bypass the
>>> IO scheduler in guest kernel, e.g. users using spinning disk. For users
>>> using fast disk device, e.g. SSD device, they can use bio-based IO path.
>>
>> Users using a spinning disk still get IO scheduling in the host though.
>> What benefit is there in doing it in the guest as well?
>
> The io scheduler waits for requests to merge and thus batch IOs together. It's not important w.r.t spinning disks since the host can do it but it causes much less vmexits which is the key issue for VMs.

Does it make sense to use the guest's I/O scheduler at all?
- It is not aware of the physical (spinning) disk layout.
- It is not aware of all the host's disk pending requests.
It does have a good side-effect - batching of requests.

Ronen.

>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rusty.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Virtualization mailing list
>> Virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ