lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1341326734-29881-8-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue,  3 Jul 2012 16:45:33 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] vfs: Remove unnecessary flushing of block devices

It is not necessary to write block devices twice. The reason why we first did
flush and then proper sync is that
  for_each_bdev() {
    write_bdev()
    wait_for_completion()
  }
is much slower than
  for_each_bdev()
    write_bdev()
  for_each_bdev()
    wait_for_completion()
when there is bigger amount of data. But as is seen in the above, there's no real
need to scan pages and submit them twice. We just need to separate the submission
and waiting part. This patch does that.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/sync.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/sync.c b/fs/sync.c
index ea6e818..6d177d1 100644
--- a/fs/sync.c
+++ b/fs/sync.c
@@ -85,14 +85,14 @@ static void sync_fs_one_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *arg)
 		sb->s_op->sync_fs(sb, *(int *)arg);
 }
 
-static void flush_one_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, void *arg)
+static void fdatawrite_one_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, void *arg)
 {
-	__sync_blockdev(bdev, 0);
+	filemap_fdatawrite(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping);
 }
 
-static void sync_one_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, void *arg)
+static void fdatawait_one_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, void *arg)
 {
-	sync_blockdev(bdev);
+	filemap_fdatawait(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -106,10 +106,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sync)
 	wakeup_flusher_threads(0, WB_REASON_SYNC);
 	iterate_supers(writeback_inodes_one_sb, NULL);
 	iterate_supers(sync_fs_one_sb, &nowait);
-	iterate_bdevs(flush_one_bdev, NULL);
 	iterate_supers(sync_inodes_one_sb, NULL);
 	iterate_supers(sync_fs_one_sb, &wait);
-	iterate_bdevs(sync_one_bdev, NULL);
+	iterate_bdevs(fdatawrite_one_bdev, NULL);
+	iterate_bdevs(fdatawait_one_bdev, NULL);
 	if (unlikely(laptop_mode))
 		laptop_sync_completion();
 	return 0;
@@ -125,10 +125,10 @@ static void do_sync_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	 */
 	iterate_supers(sync_inodes_one_sb, &nowait);
 	iterate_supers(sync_fs_one_sb, &nowait);
-	iterate_bdevs(flush_one_bdev, NULL);
+	iterate_bdevs(fdatawrite_one_bdev, NULL);
 	iterate_supers(sync_inodes_one_sb, &nowait);
 	iterate_supers(sync_fs_one_sb, &nowait);
-	iterate_bdevs(flush_one_bdev, NULL);
+	iterate_bdevs(fdatawrite_one_bdev, NULL);
 	printk("Emergency Sync complete\n");
 	kfree(work);
 }
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ