linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: tegra: Add clk_tegra structure and helper functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:31:05 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	"Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>
CC:	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>,
	"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: tegra: Add clk_tegra structure and helper functions

On 07/02/2012 06:09 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday 28 June 2012 11:58 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> We had some discussions in the past on your clock reset and external
>>> line request operations which you've had to put into struct clk_tegra.
>>>
>>> Do you need to expose those ops to code in drivers/*?  I consider that a
>>> reasonable litmus test to start considering if something should be moved
>>> into the generic clk.h api.
>>
>>
>> Yes, we need these ops in drivers. Peter has sent a patch proposing to move
>> these ops to generic clk.
>>
>> In addition, we also need mechanism/ops to change rate and parent from
>> clk_ops implementation. There was some discussion but I do not know the
>> latest status.
>>
> 
> Hi Prashant,
> 
> OK, that is good to know.  I haven't forgotten about this topic.  I'm
> still trying to think of the best way to expose less-common operations
> to drivers...
> 
> Based on Stephen's feedback in patch 0 I'll be waiting for another
> version of this series before taking into clk-next.

Oh, does this series depend on stuff in clk-next? I was intending to
take it through the Tegra tree, since it definitely depends on (in
complex ways through context if nothing else due to to large
split/rename patches) a bunch of commits in Tegra's for-3.6/common-clk
branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/