linux-kernel - [PATCH] kmsg: properly handle concurrent non-blocking read() from /proc/kmsg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1341339437.815.4.camel@mop>
Date:	Tue, 03 Jul 2012 20:17:17 +0200
From:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kmsg: properly handle concurrent non-blocking read() from
 /proc/kmsg

From: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Subject: kmsg: properly handle concurrent non-blocking read() from /proc/kmsg

The /proc/kmsg read() interface is internally simply wired up to a sequence
of syslog() syscalls, which might are racy between their checks and actions,
regarding concurrency.

In the (very uncommon) case of concurrent readers of /dev/kmsg, relying on
usual O_NONBLOCK behavior, the recently introduced mutex might block an
O_NONBLOCK reader in read(), when poll() returns for it, but another process
has already read the data in the meantime. We've seen that while running
artificial test setups and tools that "fight" about /proc/kmsg data.

This restores the original /proc/kmsg behavior, where in case of concurrent
read()s, poll() might wake up but the read() syscall will just return 0 to
the caller, while another process has "stolen" the data.

This is in the general case not the expected behavior, but it is the exact
same one, that can easily be triggered with a 3.4 kernel, and some tools
might just rely on it.

The mutex is not needed, the original integrity issue which introduced it,
is in the meantime covered by:
  "fill buffer with more than a single message for SYSLOG_ACTION_READ"
  116e90b23f74d303e8d607c7a7d54f60f14ab9f2

Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
---
 kernel/printk.c |    9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -1019,7 +1019,6 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf
 {
 	bool clear = false;
 	static int saved_console_loglevel = -1;
-	static DEFINE_MUTEX(syslog_mutex);
 	int error;

 	error = check_syslog_permissions(type, from_file);
@@ -1046,17 +1045,11 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf
 			error = -EFAULT;
 			goto out;
 		}
-		error = mutex_lock_interruptible(&syslog_mutex);
-		if (error)
-			goto out;
 		error = wait_event_interruptible(log_wait,
 						 syslog_seq != log_next_seq);
-		if (error) {
-			mutex_unlock(&syslog_mutex);
+		if (error)
 			goto out;
-		}
 		error = syslog_print(buf, len);
-		mutex_unlock(&syslog_mutex);
 		break;
 	/* Read/clear last kernel messages */
 	case SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_CLEAR:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/