[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF239F8.7030101@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:16:56 -0700
From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
To: Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@...umbus.fi>
CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeffm@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] st: get rid of scsi_tapes array
On 07/01/2012 01:57 AM, Kai Makisara wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012, Lee Duncan wrote:
>
>> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
>>
>> st currently allocates an array to store pointers to all of the
>> scsi_tape objects. It's used to discover available indexes to use as the
>> base for the minor number selection and later to look up scsi_tape
>> devices for character devices.
>>
>> We switch to using an IDR for minor selection and a pointer from
>> st_modedef back to scsi_tape for the lookups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/st.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>> drivers/scsi/st.h | 2 +
>> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>>
> ... patch removed
>
> I have finally had time to review and test this patch set. I am sorry this
> has taken so long.
>
> I have found one change of behaviour and a theoretical problem:
> The new code does not re-use the tape numbers when freed and re-scanned.
> The current code does re-use the freed numbers. Are there any reasons for
> this changed behaviour? (The theoretical problem is that the new code
> frees the tape structure but leaves the pointer in the idr tree.)
>
> The patch at the end of this message (applies after the whole series) is
> an attempt to implement re-use of tape numbers. I am not completely sure
> that the change is correctly placed but it seems to work.
Thanks for the review, and good catch. I'll look over your added patch
and give feedback as soon as I can.
>
> Another minor thing is that the documentation should be updated :-)
Of course.
>
> The patch at the end also updates the version code. I am not sure if the
> version code is useful, but it should be either updated or removed.
>
> Otherwise no problems found. I am ready to ack the patch set after the
> re-use thing has been resolved (one way or another).
>
> Thanks,
> Kai
>
--
The Lee-Man
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists