lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF239F8.7030101@suse.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:16:56 -0700
From:	Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
To:	Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@...umbus.fi>
CC:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jeffm@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] st: get rid of scsi_tapes array


On 07/01/2012 01:57 AM, Kai Makisara wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012, Lee Duncan wrote:
> 
>> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
>>
>> st currently allocates an array to store pointers to all of the
>> scsi_tape objects. It's used to discover available indexes to use as the
>> base for the minor number selection and later to look up scsi_tape
>> devices for character devices.
>>
>> We switch to using an IDR for minor selection and a pointer from
>> st_modedef back to scsi_tape for the lookups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/st.c |  172 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>>  drivers/scsi/st.h |    2 +
>>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>>
> ... patch removed
> 
> I have finally had time to review and test this patch set. I am sorry this 
> has taken so long.
> 
> I have found one change of behaviour and a theoretical problem:
> The new code does not re-use the tape numbers when freed and re-scanned. 
> The current code does re-use the freed numbers. Are there any reasons for 
> this changed behaviour? (The theoretical problem is that the new code 
> frees the tape structure but leaves the pointer in the idr tree.)
> 
> The patch at the end of this message (applies after the whole series) is 
> an attempt to implement re-use of tape numbers. I am not completely sure 
> that the change is correctly placed but it seems to work.


Thanks for the review, and good catch. I'll look over your added patch
and give feedback as soon as I can.

> 
> Another minor thing is that the documentation should be updated :-)

Of course.

> 
> The patch at the end also updates the version code. I am not sure if the 
> version code is useful, but it should be either updated or removed.
> 
> Otherwise no problems found. I am ready to ack the patch set after the 
> re-use thing has been resolved (one way or another).
> 
> Thanks,
> Kai
> 
-- 
The Lee-Man

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ