linux-kernel - Re: Use of the pwm-names DT property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FF3F54F.1060809@nvidia.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jul 2012 16:48:31 +0900
From:	Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Use of the pwm-names DT property

On Wed 04 Jul 2012 04:39:42 PM JST, Thierry Reding wrote:
> In fact the *-names properties are rather common. They are used for the
> reg and interrupts properties. The pinctrl subsystem and the upcoming
> clock bindings also use the *-names properties. So one could just as
> well argue that the regulator and gpio bindings should have been using
> regulator-names and gpio-names respectively instead.

I was not aware of that, thanks for the explanation. Too bad the DT is 
already split in two different ways for naming things.

Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/