[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C4FBD4FA06A3458594FEA8117B2274B6@realtek.com.tw>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:02:17 +0800
From: hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To: 'Francois Romieu' <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] r8169: support RTL8106E
Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@...zoreil.com]
[...]
> > +#define FIRMWARE_8106E_1 "rtl_nic/rtl8106e-1.fw"
>
> I did not notice it. Was it submitted ?
>
I don't submit it yet.
> It was obviously not required for testing :o)
>
> > @@ -1933,6 +1941,8 @@ static void
> rtl8169_get_mac_version(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
> > { 0x7c800000, 0x30000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_11 },
> >
> > /* 8101 family. */
> > + { 0x7cf00000, 0x44900000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39 },
> > + { 0x7c800000, 0x44800000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39 },
> > { 0x7c800000, 0x44000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_37 },
> > { 0x7cf00000, 0x40b00000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_30 },
> > { 0x7cf00000, 0x40a00000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_30 },
>
> Realtek's 1.022.00 8101 driver only maps { 0x7c800000; 0x44800000 } to
> a generic device - if at all - and it maps { 0x7cf00000; 0x44800000 }
> to a different chipset (namely CFG_METHOD_15 where RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39
> is CFG_METHOD_16).
>
> Why should both drivers diverge ?
>
Our PMs say only 0x44900000 would have mass production. Besides, you could use
the same setting for both of them.
Best Regards,
Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists