[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF41E2D.30104@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 16:12:53 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: "lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: fixed: dt: support for input supply
On Wednesday 04 July 2012 03:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:32:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> In non-DT, the input supply is passed with the regulator_init_data
>> through the fixed voltage config and it is filled in board files.
> No, this is a legacy way of doing things. All regulators should be
> moving to specifying the name in their descriptor except for supplies
> that are power roots (which are often fixed voltage regulators).
Then the input_supply should be set through the regulator init data
"init_data->supply_regulator" rather than the desc? If yes then also I
need to change the forthcoming patch for tps65910 and tps6586x to pass
the supply_regulator through init_data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists