linux-kernel - Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.5-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120704133455.GC29954@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:34:55 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.5-rc5

On Tue 03-07-12 21:12:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in
> v3.5-rc5[1] compared to v3.4[2].
> 
> Too make this mail fit in the lkml limit, I deleted
>   - all implicit function declaration error improvements
>   - 245 lines about __mcount_loc on sparc64
>   - all warning improvements
> 
> Summarized:
>   - build errors: +227/-575
>   - build warnings: +644/-805
> 
> JFYI, when comparing v3.5-rc5 to v3.5-rc4[3], the summaries are:
>   - build errors: +20/-11
>   - build warnings: +130/-533
> 
> Note that there may be false regressions, as some logs are incomplete.
> Still, they're build errors/warnings.
> 
> As I haven't mastered kup yet, there's no verbose summary at
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/geert/linux-log/v3.5-rc5.summary.gz
> 
> Happy fixing! ;-)
> 
> Thanks to the linux-next team for providing the build service.
...
>   + fs/quota/quota_tree.c: warning: format '%zd' expects argument of type 'signed size_t', but argument 4 has type 'ssize_t' [-Wformat]:  => 372:4
>   + fs/quota/quota_v2.c: warning: format '%zd' expects argument of type 'signed size_t', but argument 5 has type 'ssize_t' [-Wformat]:  => 66:92
  These really look like false positives (there are quite a few of this
kind). Can we possibly silence them?

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/