[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120704142309.GJ29842@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 16:23:09 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
yinghan@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...bao.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] Make TestSetPageDirty and dirty page accounting in
one func
[Add Nick to the CC]
On Thu 28-06-12 19:01:15, Sha Zhengju wrote:
> From: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...bao.com>
>
> Commit a8e7d49a(Fix race in create_empty_buffers() vs __set_page_dirty_buffers())
> extracts TestSetPageDirty from __set_page_dirty and is far away from
> account_page_dirtied.But it's better to make the two operations in one single
> function to keep modular.
> So in order to avoid the potential race mentioned in
> commit a8e7d49a, we can hold private_lock until __set_page_dirty completes.
So this is exactly what Nick suggested in the beginning
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/19/169)
> I guess there's no deadlock between ->private_lock and ->tree_lock by quick look.
Yes and mm/filemap.c says that explicitly:
* Lock ordering:
*
* ->i_mmap_mutex (truncate_pagecache)
* ->private_lock (__free_pte->__set_page_dirty_buffers)
* ->swap_lock (exclusive_swap_page, others)
* ->mapping->tree_lock
>
> It's a prepare patch for following memcg dirty page accounting patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...bao.com>
The patch seems to be correct.
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 838a9cf..e8d96b8 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -610,9 +610,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_dirty_inode);
> * If warn is true, then emit a warning if the page is not uptodate and has
> * not been truncated.
> */
> -static void __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
> +static int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
> struct address_space *mapping, int warn)
> {
> + if (unlikely(!mapping))
> + return !TestSetPageDirty(page);
> +
> + if (TestSetPageDirty(page))
> + return 0;
> +
> spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> if (page->mapping) { /* Race with truncate? */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && !PageUptodate(page));
> @@ -622,6 +628,8 @@ static void __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
> +
> + return 1;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -667,11 +675,9 @@ int __set_page_dirty_buffers(struct page *page)
> bh = bh->b_this_page;
> } while (bh != head);
> }
> - newly_dirty = !TestSetPageDirty(page);
> + newly_dirty = __set_page_dirty(page, mapping, 1);
> spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
>
> - if (newly_dirty)
> - __set_page_dirty(page, mapping, 1);
> return newly_dirty;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_buffers);
> @@ -1115,14 +1121,9 @@ void mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!test_set_buffer_dirty(bh)) {
> - struct page *page = bh->b_page;
> - if (!TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
> - struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
> - if (mapping)
> - __set_page_dirty(page, mapping, 0);
> - }
> - }
> + if (!test_set_buffer_dirty(bh))
> + __set_page_dirty(bh->b_page, page_mapping(bh->b_page), 0);
> +
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_dirty);
>
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists