[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF45DDF.9000306@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 00:14:39 +0900
From: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm-backlight: add regulator and GPIO support
On Wed 04 Jul 2012 10:00:56 PM JST, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> That's very bad indeed. I assumed that the kernel would free
>> devm-allocated resources after probe returned -EPROBE_DEFER,
>
> It indeed does free devm allocated resources, but neither the gpio nor
> the pwm are devm allocated.
As far as I can tell the gpio is allocated through devm as well:
> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, data->enable_gpio,
> + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "backlight_enable");
Thus if it is not reclaimed with probe returns with -EPROBE_DEFER, then
I guess something is going wrong elsewhere. You are right that the PWM
should be freed by the driver thought.
> Also please be aware that using a regulator in the pwm backlight will
> instantly break all existing users. That's hardly your fault though.
Sorry, I don't see why. Could you elaborate on this?
Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists