linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: ab8500: Set enable enable_time in regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120704154821.GG4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jul 2012 16:48:21 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: ab8500: Set enable enable_time in
 regulator_desc

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:31:45AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> ---
> Hi Linus,
> While working on this patch, I found in original code:
> ab8500_regulator_ops set enable_time callback to ab8500_regulator_enable_time,
> but does not set the delay in ab8500_regulator_info.
> I'm not sure the delay value is 0 for ab8500_regulator_ops, or the setting is
> just missing.
> Anyway, there is no behavior change by this patch.

Surely if the delay is not set in info then it'll introduce a delay
which wasn't there before (but which may well be a bug fix)?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)