[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lij0w8np.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:10:42 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Asias He <asias@...hat.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, dlaor@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:39:39 +0800, Asias He <asias@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 02:41 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Sure, our guest merging might save us 100x as many exits as no merging.
> > But since we're not doing many requests, does it matter?
>
> We can still have many requests with slow devices. The number of
> requests depends on the workload in guest. E.g. 512 IO threads in guest
> keeping doing IO.
You can have many requests outstanding. But if the device is slow, the
rate of requests being serviced must be low.
Am I misunderstanding something? I thought if you could have a high
rate of requests, it's not a slow device.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists