linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3] regulator: ad5398: Fix min/max current limit boundary checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:12:03 -0400
From:	"Zhang, Sonic" <Sonic.Zhang@...log.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] regulator: ad5398: Fix min/max current limit
 boundary checking

Acked-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Axel Lin [mailto:axel.lin@...il.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:55 AM
>To: Mark Brown
>Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Zhang, Sonic; Lars-Peter Clausen; Liam
>Girdwood
>Subject: [PATCH v3] regulator: ad5398: Fix min/max current limit boundary
>checking
>
>It is ok to request current limit with min_uA < chip->min_uA and
>max_uA > chip->max_uA.
>
>We need to set min_uA = chip->min_uA if (min_uA < chip->min_uA),
>this ensures the equation to calcuate selator does not return negative number.
>
>Also set max_uA = chip->max_uA if (max_uA > chip->max_uA), as suggested by
>Sonic.
>
>Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
>---
> drivers/regulator/ad5398.c |    9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/regulator/ad5398.c b/drivers/regulator/ad5398.c
>index 46d05f3..f123f7e 100644
>--- a/drivers/regulator/ad5398.c
>+++ b/drivers/regulator/ad5398.c
>@@ -89,9 +89,12 @@ static int ad5398_set_current_limit(struct regulator_dev
>*rdev, int min_uA, int
>       unsigned short data;
>       int ret;
>
>-      if (min_uA > chip->max_uA || min_uA < chip->min_uA)
>-              return -EINVAL;
>-      if (max_uA > chip->max_uA || max_uA < chip->min_uA)
>+      if (min_uA < chip->min_uA)
>+              min_uA = chip->min_uA;
>+      if (max_uA > chip->max_uA)
>+              max_uA = chip->max_uA;
>+
>+      if (min_uA > chip->max_uA || max_uA < chip->min_uA)
>               return -EINVAL;
>
>       selector = DIV_ROUND_UP((min_uA - chip->min_uA) * chip->current_level,
>--
>1.7.9.5
>
>
>