[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207050012.38942.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 00:12:38 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@...rix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] tpm_nsc: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Make the tpm_nsc driver define its PM callbacks through
a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks
in struct platform_driver.
This allows the driver to use tpm_pm_suspend() and tpm_pm_resume()
as its PM callbacks directly, without defining its own PM callback
routines.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nsc.c | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nsc.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nsc.c
+++ linux/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nsc.c
@@ -274,22 +274,13 @@ static void tpm_nsc_remove(struct device
}
}
-static int tpm_nsc_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t msg)
-{
- return tpm_pm_suspend(&dev->dev);
-}
-
-static int tpm_nsc_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
-{
- return tpm_pm_resume(&dev->dev);
-}
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tpm_nsc_pm, tpm_pm_suspend, tpm_pm_resume);
static struct platform_driver nsc_drv = {
- .suspend = tpm_nsc_suspend,
- .resume = tpm_nsc_resume,
.driver = {
.name = "tpm_nsc",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pm = &tpm_nsc_pm,
},
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists