| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:16:23 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
CC: <lenb@...nel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <shuahkhan@...il.com>, <liuj97@...il.com>,
<andi@...stfloor.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] ACPI: Add _OST support for sysfs eject
Hi Toshi,
2012/06/27 5:42, Toshi Kani wrote:
> Changed acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() to support _OST. This function is
> also changed to global so that it can be called from hotplug notify
> handlers to perform hot-remove operation.
>
> Changed acpi_eject_store(), which is the sysfs eject handler. It checks
> eject_pending to see if the request was originated from ACPI eject
> notification. If not, it calls _OST(0x103,84,) per Figure 6-37 in ACPI
> 5.0 spec.
>
> Added eject_pending bit to acpi_device_flags. This bit is set when the
> kernel has received an ACPI eject notification, but does not initiate
> its hot-remove operation by itself.
>
> Added struct acpi_eject_event. This structure is used to pass extended
> information to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), which has a single argument
> to support asynchronous call
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 9 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index c8a1f3b..dbdb9fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -83,19 +83,29 @@ acpi_device_modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, cha
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(modalias, 0444, acpi_device_modalias_show, NULL);
>
> -static void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context)
> +/**
> + * acpi_bus_hot_remove_device: hot-remove a device and its children
> + * @context: struct acpi_eject_event pointer (freed in this func)
> + *
> + * Hot-remove a device and its children. This function frees up the
> + * memory space passed by arg context, so that the caller may call
> + * this function asynchronously through acpi_os_hotplug_execute().
> + */
> +void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context)
> {
> + struct acpi_eject_event *ej_event = (struct acpi_eject_event *) context;
> struct acpi_device *device;
> - acpi_handle handle = context;
> + acpi_handle handle = ej_event->handle;
> struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
> union acpi_object arg;
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> + u32 ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE; /* default */
>
> if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
> - return;
> + goto err_out;
>
> if (!device)
> - return;
> + goto err_out;
>
> ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> "Hot-removing device %s...\n", dev_name(&device->dev)));
> @@ -103,7 +113,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context)
> if (acpi_bus_trim(device, 1)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> "Removing device failed\n");
> - return;
> + goto err_out;
> }
>
> /* power off device */
> @@ -129,10 +139,20 @@ static void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context)
> * TBD: _EJD support.
> */
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_EJ0", &arg_list, NULL);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> - printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
> - "Eject device failed\n");
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> + pr_warn(PREFIX "Eject device failed\n");
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(context);
> + return;
>
> +err_out:
> + /* Inform firmware the hot-remove operation has completed w/ error */
> + (void) acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(handle,
> + ej_event->event, ost_code, NULL);
> + kfree(context);
> return;
> }
When I read your patch named [PATCH] ACPI: Add ACPI CPU hot-remove support,
a question about this patch appeared.
The question is :
Why does not acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() inform firmware of
ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS, when it succeeded? Are thre any reasons?
If you have already discussed my question, please let me know the log.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> @@ -144,6 +164,7 @@ acpi_eject_store(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr,
> acpi_status status;
> acpi_object_type type = 0;
> struct acpi_device *acpi_device = to_acpi_device(d);
> + struct acpi_eject_event *ej_event;
>
> if ((!count) || (buf[0] != '1')) {
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -160,7 +181,25 @@ acpi_eject_store(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - acpi_os_hotplug_execute(acpi_bus_hot_remove_device, acpi_device->handle);
> + ej_event = kmalloc(sizeof(*ej_event), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ej_event) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ej_event->handle = acpi_device->handle;
> + if (acpi_device->flags.eject_pending) {
> + /* event originated from ACPI eject notification */
> + ej_event->event = ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST;
> + acpi_device->flags.eject_pending = 0;
> + } else {
> + /* event originated from user */
> + ej_event->event = ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_EJECT;
> + (void) acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(ej_event->handle,
> + ej_event->event, ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + acpi_os_hotplug_execute(acpi_bus_hot_remove_device, (void *)ej_event);
> err:
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index 1d9e432..b22b774 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ struct acpi_device_flags {
> u32 suprise_removal_ok:1;
> u32 power_manageable:1;
> u32 performance_manageable:1;
> - u32 reserved:24;
> + u32 eject_pending:1;
> + u32 reserved:23;
> };
>
> /* File System */
> @@ -334,6 +335,11 @@ struct acpi_bus_event {
> u32 data;
> };
>
> +struct acpi_eject_event {
> + acpi_handle handle;
> + u32 event;
> +};
> +
> extern struct kobject *acpi_kobj;
> extern int acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event(const char*, const char*, u8, int);
> void acpi_bus_private_data_handler(acpi_handle, void *);
> @@ -371,6 +377,7 @@ int acpi_bus_register_driver(struct acpi_driver *driver);
> void acpi_bus_unregister_driver(struct acpi_driver *driver);
> int acpi_bus_add(struct acpi_device **child, struct acpi_device *parent,
> acpi_handle handle, int type);
> +void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context);
> int acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *start, int rmdevice);
> int acpi_bus_start(struct acpi_device *device);
> acpi_status acpi_bus_get_ejd(acpi_handle handle, acpi_handle * ejd);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists