linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120705141329.GN4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:13:29 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device
 registration

On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 05/07/12 14:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> >The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making
> >it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that
> >we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the
> >DT and the non-DT case.

> Ah, is that what you were saying Mark?

> If so, I apologise. I thought you meant register both from platform
> code. I'm happy to register the AB8500 from the DB8500 for _both_ DT
> and !DT.

Yes, that's what I was trying to say - sorry that I wasn't clear!

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)