[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF5B329.9090005@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 10:30:49 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <b04825@...escale.com>
To: Zhao Chenhui <chenhui.zhao@...escale.com>
CC: Zhao Chenhui-B35336 <B35336@...escale.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@...escale.com>,
"galak@...nel.crashing.org" <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@...escale.com>, <leoli@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync
Zhao Chenhui wrote:
> If the guts node is missing, this code snippet will be skipped. If the guts node is existed,
> the return value of of_iomap(), namely guts, will be tested. If it is NULL, it shows
> that there is error in dts, or the ioremap() in of_iomap() failed. I think
> these errors are fatal errors, so I print an error info and return.
Ok, I see your point now. I'm concerned about what might happen if
someone else updates mpc85xx_smp_init() in the future, but there's nothing
actually wrong with your patch today.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists