[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF5E1C3.6070309@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:49:39 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC: mturquette@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, ccross@...roid.com, olof@...om.net,
pdeschrijver@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Port Tegra to generic clk framework
On 07/05/2012 03:55 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> This patch set ports Tegra clock code to generic clock framework.
Unfortunately, this series causes some regressions, so I can't apply it
now. Given that, it won't make 3.6 since I won't be around to apply it.
I tested both Tegra's for-next, and next-20120705, both plus this
series, next-20120705 plus the fix for the common clock code
__clk_set_parent() issue.
The following all appeared to work OK:
Cardhu DT
Ventana DT
Seaboard DT
Springbank DT
Harmony DT
Harmony non-DT
However, the following failed, all(?) in ways that prevented the system
getting to the login prompt:
Whistler DT
AC100 DT
AC100 non-DT
Trimslice DT
Trimslice non-DT
(The one slight difference between the 2 branches I tested is that AC100
and Trimslice booted using DT passed in next-20120705 but failed only in
Tegra's for-next. Otherwise, all results were identical)
I'll try to investigate what the issues are since I imagine you don't
have access to these boards. But, I probably won't be able to fix this
until I return from vacation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists