[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120705150012.63b7d7be0a0f549cfe650515@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:00:12 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the vfs tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in kernel/fork.c
between commit 7ab538da1f8a ("trim task_work: get rid of hlist") from the
vfs tree and commit 0ea86208345b ("sched, mm: Rework sched_{fork,exec}
node assignment") from the tip tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc kernel/fork.c
index bebabad,1a69745..0000000
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@@ -1414,8 -1415,7 +1415,7 @@@ static struct task_struct *copy_process
* We dont wake it up yet.
*/
p->group_leader = p;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->thread_group);
- INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&p->task_works);
+ p->task_works = NULL;
/* Now that the task is set up, run cgroup callbacks if
* necessary. We need to run them before the task is visible
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists