[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341527482.4020.1355.camel@calx>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:31:22 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
w@....eu, ewust@...ch.edu, zakir@...ch.edu, greg@...ah.com,
nadiah@...ucsd.edu, jhalderm@...ch.edu, tglx@...utronix.de,
davem@...emloft.net, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] random: make 'add_interrupt_randomness()' do
something sane
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 15:21 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> >
> > Like this?
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> Although I think it might be better to stay closer to what we used to
> do, and just 'or' in the action flags rather than make it some
> conditional. And then at the end, do
>
> if (!(flags & __IRQF_TIMER))
> add_interrupt_randomness(irq)
On systems with a timer interrupt and a sched_clock() that's
asynchronous to it, this actually loses a great source of entropy for
headless systems. Also: extra branch in fast path.
It's better to mix and not credit than to not mix at all. Instead just
check the fast count against HZ before the credit.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists