[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1341469733-12104-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:28:53 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcg: replace inexistence move_lock_page_cgroup() by move_lock_mem_cgroup() in comment
From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3d318f6..63e36e7 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ again:
return;
/*
* If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't
- * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold
+ * need to take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). Because we already hold
* rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until
* rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true.
*/
@@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(struct page *page, unsigned long *flags)
/*
* It's guaranteed that pc->mem_cgroup never changes while
* lock is held because a routine modifies pc->mem_cgroup
- * should take move_lock_page_cgroup().
+ * should take move_lock_mem_cgroup().
*/
move_unlock_mem_cgroup(pc->mem_cgroup, flags);
}
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists